On the one hand, we might wish that the Dalai Lama had written his own
book, and see Cutler as a screen between us and the Dalai Lama. But Cutler
does add some things to the book: (1) He asks the questions that a Westerner
would ask. At times they seem like stupid questions, but on the whole Cutler
and the Dalai Lama form a Watson/Holmes pair. As in Castaneda's Don
Juan books, the narrator is probably not as simple-minded as he sometimes
makes himself appear. (2) He summarizes Western scientific research that
supports points the Dalai Lama makes. (3) He illustrates the Dalai Lama's
teachings by examples from his personal life and his practice as a psychiatrist.
(4) He can testify to the Dalai Lama's sincerity, and describe the Dalai
Lama's reactions objectively. He can be impressed by the Dalai Lama in
a way that would be obnoxious for the Dalai Lama to communicate in his
own voice.